The Left Wing Caucus
represented a left-wing tendency within the Young Socialist League.
Their slogan, "Unity to Left," invited controversy among the less
radical members of the YSL, who believed that they wished to unite with
the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party. Instead, the group urged
the development of a coalition of those who are closest to their
ideology already and are moving to the left.
They also criticize Michael Harrington's depiction of their caucus as a group of Trotskyists while at the same time urging the avoidance of working with reformist groups and parties, such as the Socialist Party and the support of Communists for the Democratic Party. |
|
The files are provided in pdf format and may load slowly. They are provided for viewing purposes only and, therefore, printing has been disallowed as a security measure.
April 1957
Section 1: This edition opens with a discussion
of the slogan of the Left-Wing Caucus: "unity to the left." The
most important part of this section is devoted to explaining the purpose of the
Left-Wing Caucus and railing against the reactionary imperialist blocs and
promoting a Third Camp led by the working class. In an open letter to
Michael Harrington, the Left-Wing Caucus disputes his characterization of the
caucus as a sectarian group urging unity with the Socialist Workers'
Party.
Section 2: Shane Mage discusses the exclusion of
Stalinist organizations from the Young Socialist League, contending that since
Khrushchev's speech concerning Stalin's excesses, their attitude has
fundamentally changed. The implications of the hesitant stance of the
Right Wing towards the Stalinist groups is that it ignores a potential political
windfall. Instead, the movement toward the right will only serve to
alienate these potential revolutionaries. Additionally, the treatment of
the Gates group comes under scrutiny, and the author expresses the fear that
they have not broken enough with the Stalinist tendency. The author
denounces Communist support of the Democratic Party and its apologies for
Stalinism. The question of United Fronts is discussed further, especially
between ex-LYLers and members of the Communist Party. An open letter to
two leaders of the Independent Socialist League is included, which implores them
to stand against the reformist drift of the "Shachtman-Gates
tendency."
Section 3: This section begins with discussion of
the Menshevik tendency that, despite the Bolshevik victory in the Russian
Revolution, continues to exist among academics, such as Don Harris. While
the author does not discount the potential political evolution, he demands
evidence before essentially dissolving the movement. S. Aesop, a pseudonym
for one of the authors, describes the political situation of leftists through a
parable about warring tribes led by a Shaman. Martha Wohlforth seeks to
persuade her readers that the very right to strike itself is threatened due to
racketeering investigations in the Senate and their potential
exploitation. She argues instead that the corruption of unions is a result
of the capitalist system, while attacking Labor Action for kowtowing to
the labor bureaucracy. Shane Mage discusses the issue of inclusion in the
YSL in "Letter to a YSL Comrade," insisting that sectarian divisions
need to be overcome to promote independent action of the working class.
The Socialist Party comes under scrutiny for its retreat from radical politics
and the idea that the left wing is a group of Trotskyist apologists is
dismissed.
Section 4: Tim Wohlforth challenges those who
support unity with the SP-SDF (Socialist Party-Social Democratic Federation) but
seek to maintain independent political thought to write an article to Labor
Action and criticize the policies of the SP-SDF. Scott Arden
criticizes an article by Comrade Meier which (illogically) complains about the
reactionary nature of abstentions. In Letters to the Editor, the editor
responds to a claim that the Left Wing Caucus is prejudiced against those who
believe in God. The Berkeley Unit of the YSL opened the pages of the Challenge
to those who are against unity to ensure a democratic discussion. The
edition concludes with an article reprinted from the Reading Labor Advocate,
which discusses the views of the SP-SDF on various issues.
<Previous Radical Newsletters Main Page Next>
Updated 12/13/05